HOME
MESSAGE

ARCHIVE

SUBMIT


paintdeath:

Sculpture by Kate Macdowell

mymissus:

Not to take my newfound tolerance of Taylor Swift immediately to the next level, but I think this is an important learning moment for Tumblr:

I’ve been seeing a lot of messages going around about the “cultural appropriation” of using twerkers in the Shake It Off video. It’s not. Let me delineate the difference between cultural appropriation and cultural representation.

It’s pretty clear in the Shake It Off video that Taylor is not good at any of these dances. Not twerking, not ballet, not interpretive. She is clearly set apart from all of these dance forms and the cultures they may or may not be a part of. The plot of the video is that she tries to fit in in all these places, but in the end she just needs to shake her white booty in some Keds. She is not taking on the twerking culture as her own. She is not claiming she has an authentic role in it. She is allowing the people who ARE authentically a part of it to demonstrate it and keeping herself separate from it. This is cultural representation and it’s harmless.

Cultural appropriation is when Miley Cyrus claims she - as a rich and famous white girl - has any authentic ownership over twerking or its related culture. It’s when she puts herself as the central focal point of said culture in her video and implies that she is a representative of it, like it’s all about “her and her girls.”

I don’t make this distinction because I think it’s important that Taylor get away with shit and Miley does not. I make it because I’m concerned “cultural appropriation” is becoming a Tumblr buzzword that’s used as an excuse to write an enraged anonymous message about a pop star you don’t like instead of an actual social and pop cultural issue. I’m concerned you’re throwing it out there to get notes.

I’m concerned you keep using that word. But I do not think it means what you think it means.

(via ppizzaslutt)




werewolfau:

At a deposition, Ferguson’s former police chief revealed that his staff did not keep records of incidents in which officers used force against citizens, so long as no one died; in other words, there was no way of telling how often incidents like Davis’ happened.

remember shit like this when they talk about how mike brown’s shooter had no disciplinary record

(via cendres-et-vin)


humansofnewyork:

"We don’t like pictures like this. It is not good to deduce an entire country to the image of a person reaching out for food. It is not good for people to see us like this, and it is not good for us to see ourselves like this. This gives us no dignity. We don’t want to be shown as a country of people waiting for someone to bring us food. Congo has an incredible amount of farmland. An incredible amount of resources. Yes, we have a lot of problems. But food is not what we are reaching for. We need investment. We need the means to develop ourselves." 

(Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo)

fartgallery:

Your honour. Members of the jury. Police security man guy. The Defendant. Me. The lady sitting in the fifth row with the weird hat. no I am not stalling for time

(via cityinthewinter)




coldaethyl:

ithinkhesgaybutwesavedmufasa:

So, I had a guy hand me his number today and he followed it with, "I mean no disrespect, but here—"

I told him I was flattered but had a long term, serious girlfriend, who I loved very much.

To which he responded, still pleasant and with polite interest,  ”She’s a lucky woman. How long have you been together?”

THAT is how you approach/handle a ‘no’, boys. take fucking notes.

Reblogging because this is freakin’ important

(via destiny-isoverrated)